Cutera

excel HR

755 nm Alexandrite and 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser with sapphire contact cooling

NEWManufacturer quote required USEDNo reconciled dated sample FDACleared 2013

Derivative cost, used-market, and ROI pages are withheld until dated pricing evidence is reconciled.

Last updated: 2026-08-25

Open shortlist
Cutera excel HR laser system and handpiece
Manufacturer-provided product image from Cutera. View original source. Shown for editorial identification; no endorsement is implied.

Model, regulatory, and ownership file

Category
Laser Hair Removal
Manufacturer
Cutera
Model scope
excel HR. Catalog model name; exact configuration needs reconciliation.
Regulatory status
Exact FDA record in source packet. K132185.
Labeled or intended-use scope
Hair-bearing areas, Benign pigmented lesions, Selected vascular lesions
Configuration
755 nm Alexandrite and 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser with sapphire contact cooling
Consumables and recurring dependencies
Not publicly itemized
Service and warranty
Service quote required
Training
Confirm the current manufacturer or distributor requirement in writing.
Software
Confirm version, subscription, security support, and transfer eligibility in writing.
Used transfer
Verify serial number, title, recall status, service eligibility, software access, training, accessories, and warranty after transfer.
Evidence
Source-backed profile. Packet: No dated source packet yet. Access date: 2026-08-20.
Limitations
Commercial terms and exact-model provenance remain subject to current source checks.

Practice ownership and buying signals

OwnershipNo reader benchmark yet
EvaluationNo reader benchmark yet
Replacement intentNo reader benchmark yet
SponsorNo sponsor

Device Pulse is not collecting these actions on this page. Disabled controls show the planned reader service without creating a response, lead, sponsor relationship, or vendor request.

Show alternatives

Activation requires a separate consent notice, controlled storage, duplicate and suppression rules, retention and deletion controls, named vendor-transfer disclosure, and an audit log. Newsletter signup does not activate these controls.

Overview

excel HR is a Cutera platform in the hair removal lasers category. The manufacturer describes it as using 755 nm Alexandrite and 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser with sapphire contact cooling for hair-bearing areas, benign pigmented lesions, selected vascular lesions. Those specifications are company-reported, not an independent performance conclusion.

Cutera describes excel HR as a dual-wavelength system for hair reduction across Fitzpatrick skin types I-VI. That description is company-reported and does not establish comparative superiority. The cited FDA records establish only the device names, classifications, or indications stated in those records. They do not establish comparative superiority, outcomes for every patient, or current commercial terms.

Before purchase, request the exact model, cleared indications, software version, handpieces, service coverage, training, and a written quote. Pricing and operating economics remain unknown where a current source packet was not available.

TREATMENT AREAS

Hair-bearing areas, Benign pigmented lesions, Selected vascular lesions

TREATMENT TIME

Varies by treatment area and operator settings

SESSIONS

Protocol depends on indication, skin type, and hair cycle

PER SESSION

Practice-set; no verified range

CONSUMABLES/YR

Not publicly itemized

MAINTENANCE/YR

Service quote required

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Dual 755 nm and 1064 nm wavelengths cover different hair and skin profiles
  • Sapphire contact cooling is integrated into the handpiece
  • The current Cutera page publishes detailed indications and safety information
  • FDA device listing identifies the product and premarket submission

Cons

  • Cutera does not publish a current acquisition price on the reviewed page
  • Treatment speed depends on area, settings, and operator technique
  • Hair-removal lasers can cause burns, pigment changes, scarring, and paradoxical hair growth
  • A buyer still needs written service, software, training, and transfer terms

Clinical Evidence

The reviewed manufacturer page cites the excel HR operator manual. Device Pulse did not find a reconciled independent comparative study packet during this review, so comparative performance remains unverified.

This profile does not treat a clearance record or manufacturer page as proof of superior outcomes. Match each clinical claim to the exact model, indication, study design, sample size, source date, and funding disclosure.

The current packet supports product identification and the limited regulatory statements shown here. Independent comparative effectiveness, local demand, and practice economics remain open diligence questions.

ROI Analysis

Device Pulse is not publishing a payback estimate for excel HR because current transaction price, financing, service, consumables, staffing, and local patient demand have not been independently verified.

Build the decision from your written quote. Model conservative monthly treatment volume, realized revenue per treatment, consumables, operator time, service, downtime, financing, and patient-acquisition cost. Run a downside case before using the model in a purchase decision.

A manufacturer projection is an input to test, not a forecast. Ask for every assumption in writing and compare it with your scheduling capacity and historical conversion data.

Best For

Practices comparing a dual-wavelength hair-removal platform and willing to verify configuration, training, cooling performance, and service terms in writing.

Use that as a short-list hypothesis. Confirm the exact indication, patient mix, operator training, local service, workflow, and written commercial terms before deciding that the platform fits the practice.

Buying Guide

Request a written, model-specific quote for excel HR. Separate the console, handpieces, software, training, installation, warranty, service, and recurring supplies or licensing.

Confirm the serial number, current software, cleared indications, ownership-transfer terms, parts availability, response time, and local service provider. Do not assume a product-page feature applies to every configuration.

Ask Cutera to identify which statements are specifications, which are company-reported claims, and which are supported by independent clinical evidence. Keep those records with the final contract.

Alternatives to review

Use these profiles to build a short list. An alternative listing is not a claim of equivalence or superiority.

GentleMax Pro Plus

GentleMax Pro Plus: High-volume med spas and dermatology practices where hair removal is a top revenue line. Practices serving diverse patient skin types that need both Alexandrite

NEW $115,000-$175,000  ·  USED $45,000-$90,000

Review alternative →

LightSheer Quattro

LightSheer Quattro: Med spas wanting the diode hair removal category leader at a lower price point than GentleMax Pro Plus. Practices with dense-hair patients where Vacu mode deliv

NEW $90,000-$140,000  ·  USED $35,000-$70,000

Review alternative →

Soprano ICE Platinum

Soprano ICE Platinum: Med spas that market pain-free hair removal as a differentiator. High-retention practices serving patients who avoid traditional hair removal lasers.

NEW $80,000-$130,000  ·  USED $30,000-$60,000

Review alternative →

Clarity II

Clarity II: Dermatology and med spa practices that want dual-wavelength hair removal on a budget. Buyers who value clinical capability over brand recognition.

NEW $80,000-$125,000  ·  USED $35,000-$70,000

Review alternative →

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does excel HR cost?

A current acquisition price was not published in the reviewed source packet. Request a written quote from Cutera that separates the console, handpieces, software, training, installation, warranty, service, and recurring supplies.

What is the FDA status of excel HR?

FDA device listing names excel HR under powered laser surgical instrument, product code GEX, with premarket submission K132185.

What evidence supports this excel HR profile?

The reviewed manufacturer page cites the excel HR operator manual. Device Pulse did not find a reconciled independent comparative study packet during this review, so comparative performance remains unverified. The source packet separates FDA public records from manufacturer-reported product information. It does not establish comparative superiority.

Which practices should evaluate excel HR?

Practices comparing a dual-wavelength hair-removal platform and willing to verify configuration, training, cooling performance, and service terms in writing. That is an editorial fit question, not a clinical or financial conclusion.

What should a buyer verify before ordering excel HR?

Verify the exact model, cleared indications, handpieces, software, serial-number history, training, service response, warranty, ownership-transfer terms, recurring supplies, and every commercial assumption in writing.

What are the main limitations in this excel HR profile?

Current limitations include: Cutera does not publish a current acquisition price on the reviewed page; Treatment speed depends on area, settings, and operator technique; Hair-removal lasers can cause burns, pigment changes, scarring, and paradoxical hair growth. Recheck the dated primary sources before using the profile in a purchase decision.